Sunday, November 5, 2017, 13:44 The Supreme Court of Israel accepted the appeal filed by the attorneys of a minor accused of involvement with ‘price tag’ incidents and obligated the Attorney General’s office to transfer to the defendant’s attorneys the ‘confidential’ appraisal by the GSS (Shabak), despite decisive opposition by the GSS and the Attorney General’s Office.
The defendant, a minor from one of the communities in the Binyamin region, is accused of involvement with a series of ‘price tag’ incidents. As part of the investigative material which the State of Israel intends to present against the minor during his trial, there is an appraisal by a GSS agent known as ‘Meir’, which the GSS has refused to transfer to the minor’s defense attorneys. The transfer is conditioned on the attorneys signing on an agreement of confidentiality.
The agreement of confidentiality which the GSS wanted Honenu Attorneys Chai Haber and Yehuda Shushan, who are representing the minor, to sign states that, “transferring the document to another constitutes a criminal offense.” The document also states that the attorneys must keep the appraisal completely confidential and not transfer it to anyone, “either in writing or orally, either tacitly or explicitly, and not by any other means,” and that revealing the appraisal to others, including family members and employees of the security system, is likely to damage the security of the State.
The attorneys refused to sign on the agreement of confidentiality, and demanded that the ‘appraisal’ be completely unconditionally transferred to them with all of the investigative material as is required by law. The attorneys noted that the demand by the GSS does not adhere to the letter of the law and that the GSS must decide whether to forgo the use of the appraisal or to take out an official certificate of confidentiality signed by the Minister of Defense as is customary in criminal trials in which the State intends to use evidence, the disclosure of which could damage the security of the State. Additionally, the attorneys claimed that signing an agreement of confidentiality would harm the defense of the minor because they intend to consult with a wide range of professionals regarding the appraisal.
The Central District Court rejected the demand by the attorneys and ruled that the GSS is not required to transfer the appraisal without the signature of the attorneys on the agreement of confidentiality. The attorneys did not relent, and filed an appeal on the decision with the Supreme Court of Israel.
In a deliberation which took place at the Supreme Court, Attorney Schweitzer from the Attorney General’s office, who represented the position of the GSS, claimed that if the appraisal reached the hands of the defense, it would, “reveal to the defense the way the GSS reaches conclusions,” and therefore transferring the document would damage the GSS and its war on ‘price tag’ incidents. After the deliberation the Supreme Court accepted the position of the attorneys and ordered the Attorney General’s office to transfer to the attorneys the appraisal unconditionally and in full.
Honenu Attorneys Chai Haber and Yehuda Shushan welcomed the decision by the Supreme Court: “We are pleased to see that the Supreme Court expressed its decisive opinion, overturned the decision of the [Central] District Court, and thereby brought about the end of the attempts by the Attorney General’s office and the GSS to interfere with and damage the defense of the defendant.”
Additionally the attorneys explained that the decision has ramifications beyond the trial of the minor, “It should be noted that the decision does not pertain only to this defendant, but rather expresses an opinion on the illegality of the start of a trend, which we identified, in the framework of which the Attorney General’s office and the GSS apparently reason that judicial and legal procedures do not apply to them. One must understand that a defendant has the right to a fair handling of the proceedings in his case, and also the right to obtain all of the evidence in his file. These rights are part of the basic rights of any proper method of trial and any attempt by the enforcement authorities to violate these principles should concern all of us. We hope that this decision will put an end to these practices.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010