Saturday night, June 18 21:54 Jerusalem Magistrate Court Judge Rachel Shalev-Gertel left in remand a 16 year old minor. The reason for the extension is the ten-minute lateness of her attorney, for whom the judge refused to wait. However, it appears that the matter is part of a series of power games being played between the Jerusalem Magistrate Court and the District Court. The courts are taking advantage of minors by playing these games.
On Friday morning Honenu attorney David HaLevi requested a reconsideration of the Jerusalem Magistrate Court’s decision to extend the remand of a 16 year old young woman who was arrested on Wednesday.
The young woman is suspected of setting on fire a vehicle belonging to an Arab in Hebron approximately one month ago. On Thursday Judge Rachel Shalev-Gertel extended her remand until Sunday. Honenu attorney HaLevi filed an appeal on her remand extension and that of two additional young women who were also arrested in the same case. All of the young women deny all charges.
On Thursday evening a deliberation took place at the District Court on the appeal and Judge Moshe Drori released two of the young women from remand, but concerning the third, ruled that the deliberation would return to the Magistrate Court due to a legal procedure. On Friday morning the deliberation took place on the request of attorney HaLevi to release the minor, because according to all opinions the matter concerns the same incident and the same evidence as that of the two young women who were released.
At 12:30 Judge Shalev-Gertel scheduled the deliberation for 13:30. Attorney Naftali Wertzberger headed to the Magistrate Court in order to arrive at the deliberation. At 13:35 the judge asked the police representative where the attorney is. He phoned Honenu attorney Wertzberger who explained that he was parking his car in the court parking lot. At 13:40 the judge ruled that the request was postponed being as the attorney had not yet arrived at the courtroom and that the minor would remain in remand until Sunday. Just as the protocol had been typed, attorney Wertzberger arrived and discovered to his astonishment the court’s postponement decision. It should be noted that the schedules of the courts are far from exact, especially on Friday, and particularly when the deliberation is scheduled on such short notice.
According to the development of the matter it seems that the decision stems from power games being played between the Magistrate Court and the District Court.
Honenu attorney HaLevi, who is representing the minor, commented on the scandalous incident, the conduct of the Magistrate Court and the police who refuse to carry out the decision of the District Court.
“The decision of the Magistrate Court to hold a deliberation on our client, a 16 year old minor, in our absence, raises surprise and wonder, especially in light of the irregularities in this case and in light of the special caution necessary when ruling on the remand of a minor.
“The matter before us,” comments attorney HaLevi, “is a situation in which three minors were arrested on suspicion of setting a vehicle on fire in Hebron approximately one month ago and are being represented by us. Already several days ago the Magistrate Court ordered a remand of six days for two of them, a period of time considered drastically long by all opinions considering that they are 15 and 16 years old, without previous convictions. On this decision we filed an appeal with the District Court, which received it and ruled that in light of the minor status of my clients and the requisite caution on the question of their remand, their release should be ordered.
“Despite the explicit decision to release them and despite the fact that orders to release them had already been signed by the District Court, the police prevented the release of my clients and returned to the Magistrate Court with an additional request to extend the remand of the minors. Our request to immediately release them from their illegal remand was rejected and the Magistrate Court chose again to order the remand of my clients despite the decision of the District Court on the matter.
“In this situation,” describes attorney HaLevi, “we came on Thursday to the District Court at six in the evening and filed an appeal on the decision. The Honorable Judge Moshe Drori arrived from his house at eight o’clock in a show of special sensitivity to the fact that minors were involved. Judge Drori ordered the immediate release of my clients from their remand in a final and absolute manner.
“In light of the decisions of the District Court and in consideration of the fact that the matter concerns the same investigative case and the same investigative operations, we requested that the Magistrate Court reexamine its decision on the remand of the third minor and order her release as the District Court had done with the two other minors in two different decisions.
“Specifically in this situation and in consideration of the development of the case, we reasoned that the court would acquiesce to our request, however not only did that not occur, but rather the deliberation took place without our presence. Despite this we estimate that already in the coming days we will succeed in bringing about the release of our client, whose status is no different from the other two minors we represented and were released after a determined legal battle.”
Sources close to the matter responded to the decision of Judge Shalev-Gertel and said that, “In consideration of the fact that the matter concerns the same judge whose decisions the District Court twice refuted, it seems that a power game is being conducted by Judge Shalev-Gertel. The problem is that the game leaves a young 16 year old woman in remand. We can see the difference in conduct between the judges. Judge Drori left his house to arrive in court at eight in the evening in order to rule on the case. Judge Shalev-Gertel, on the other hand, refused to wait three minutes and sent a minor to spend Shabbat in remand.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010