Monday, May 3, 2021, 13:33 Elhanan Gruner, a professional journalist from the HaKol HaYehudi website, petitioned the High Court of Justice with a request to order the State of Israel to justify why he has not been presented with a full copy of the gag order following which a tweet he posted was removed from Twitter. The tweet includes a photograph of a policeman from the site of the accident in which Ahuvia Sandak, z”l, was killed in a police car chase. Honenu Attorney Menashe Yado, who filed the petition on behalf of Gruner, wrote that “failure to present the order constitutes a prolonged violation [of Gruner’s rights] which must be stopped immediately.”
The petition states that while removal of the tweet in compliance with a gag order is legal, “removal of the tweet without a legally binding gag order or without presenting a gag order, constitutes illegal and undemocratic silencing, hence the request and the petition to order the Attorney General’s office to present the petitioner with a full copy of the gag order.”
Later in the petition, the factual background of the request is given. On December 22, 2020, one day after Sandak was killed, Gruner, a card-carrying member of the Israeli Government Press Office posted a video clip on his personal Twitter account from the scene of the incident in which a police investigator is seen smiling at the camera.
Two weeks later, on January 7, 2021, Twitter locked Gruner’s account until the tweet was removed on the grounds that it “violated our rules forbidding posting private media of an individual from a country in which there is a law protecting the right to privacy.”
The grounds for closing the account led to a clarification with the Attorney General’s office as to whether they were behind closing the account, and they were. Later the office confirmed that they had demanded that Twitter remove the tweet: On January 7, 2021, the Attorney General’s office sent Twitter a letter demanding that the tweet be removed in compliance with the gag order, and it was.
On January 21, 2021, two weeks after his account had been closed, Gruner received a partial copy of the gag order which does not specify what policemen are included in the order, what content is included and what justification was presented to the judge who issued the order. Since then, Gruner has requested a complete gag order from the Attorney General’s office, but has not been answered. In responses to the Union of Journalists in Israel, the Attorney General’s office did acknowledge their responsibility for removing the tweet. However the complete gag order still has not been revealed.
Due to a claim that the Jerusalem Magistrates Court had issued a gag order on the name of the police interrogator mentioned in the tweet, Gruner was interrogated at the Ma’aleh Adumim Police Station on suspicion of “violating a legal order and disseminating disinformation,” on March 3. (See here and here for updates.) However, the gag order was issued on December 27, 2020, five days after Gruner posted the video clip. Additionally, the gag order was not announced to either the media or to the public and Gruner was not informed of it until after the tweet had been removed. After the interrogation, Gruner asked the Attorney General’s office for a complete copy of the gag order, but despite repeated requests, has not received it. Therefore Gruner filed the above-mentioned petition with the High Court of Justice.
Honenu Attorney Menashe Yado, who is representing Gruner: “From the very start the Attorney General’s office has tried to keep everything in the dark. They wrote a letter to Twitter without informing the journalist whose tweet they demanded removed. They still, even now, have not presented the gag order to us. It is not unusual for the Attorney General’s office to work in the manner of ‘Big Brother,’ but it is our job to fight for democracy, freedom, and transparency.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010