Monday, April 29, 14:58 In a deliberation on Thursday, April 25 the Jerusalem Magistrate Court made a precedent making decision specifically stating that the State is discriminating against Jews on the Temple Mount. The ruling is quite relevant in light of the announcement that the Prime Minister has prohibited Knesset member Moshe Feiglin from entering the Temple Mount.
On Thursday, April 25 A., a 56 year old Jew who is accustomed to going up onto the Temple Mount from time to time after completing the mandatory purification rites, went onto the Temple Mount as is his custom. At the entrance A. passed the stringent security check and received the standard briefing: It is forbidden for Jews to act in anyway related to prayer or to make any action likely to disturb public order on the Temple Mount.
During A.’s visit on the Temple Mount while he was surrounded by policemen and Waqf personnel a group of 30 Arab women approached him, calling out “Allah hu akbar”. After the women came very close to him and continued their menacing calls A. replied to them with his own call, “Mohammad died”, referring to the founder of Islam. The policemen who had accompanied him the entire time and had chosen not to distance the disruptive women, ordered A. to leave the Temple Mount so as not to cause a clash. A. was later detained on a claim that he had disturbed public order on the Temple Mount with his call.
A. was subsequently brought to the Jerusalem Magistrate Court where the police requested that A. be banned from entering the Temple Mount for 60 days on the charge of disturbing public order with his offensive call. In response to the police representative who said that the detainee received a briefing instructing him not to make any actions that would disturb public order when he entered the Temple Mount, the Honenu attorney representing A. asked if the disruptive women had received a briefing of that sort. The police representative was forced to admit that only Jews receive the briefing.
The attorney pleaded that the situation in which the women who provoked and attempted to threaten the detainee where not detained even though their identities are well known to the police whereas his client was detained is absurd. Also the attorney pleaded that the call “Mohammad is dead” is not offensive. “After I received the request to handle this case I took a survey of five Muslim lawyers and passers-by. I asked them all if Mohammad had died and they all replied in the affirmative: according to Islam Mohammad died and is buried in Medina, Saudi Arabia,” said the Honenu attorney. The group of Arab women who provoked the detainee are known as “Murbitat” and are known to the police as a group of ideological woman who protest against Jews entering the Temple Mount. This is not the first time that the women have been involved with such a provocation.
Judge Gad Ehrenberg accepted the plea and agreed that the Arab women provoked the detainee and therefore there is no basis for the restrictive conditions which the police requested to impose on him. The judge based his ruling also on the selective enforcement of the law by the police and wrote in his decision, “Indeed the defendant’s representative was correct in his plea, according to which there was selective enforcement [of the law]…. the provocateurs were the women and not the defendant… in light of the selective enforcement [of the law], apparently not for the first time, I found no cause for placing restrictions on his release.” The detainee was unconditionally released to his home.
Honenu welcomes this important decision. “The policy of the police on the Temple Mount constitutes one of the most striking centers of discrimination in the State of Israel. We hope that this ruling by the Jerusalem Magistrate Court which has brought this serious problem to the public’s notice will be an positive influence and constitute the beginning of rectifying the embarrassing situation in which it is forbidden for Jews to freely and safely walk and all the more so to pray on what has been the holiest site of the Jewish people for thousands of years.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010