Monday, December 19, 2011, 21:04 Jerusalem District Court Judge Moshe Yo’ed HaCohen leveled strong criticism at the conduct of the Binyamin Police and the Yehuda and Shomron District Police concerning the Ramat Migron detainees. Judge HaCohen ruled that the police are making their own laws and that the detainees will be brought to court the same night. Judge Gad Ehrenberg scheduled the deliberation for 2:00 in the morning.
In the morning two minors and one young woman (not a minor) were detained at the Ramat Migron outpost on suspicion of violating a closed military zone. The three were detained in an operation initiated by the Yehuda and Shomron District Police and transferred for interrogation to the Binyamin Police. After interrogation the police interrogators decided to hold two of them in remand and bring them to court. However despite the fact that the law requires bringing an detainee to court as quickly as possible and the fact that the interrogation was completed during the morning, the police announced that the detainees would be brought to court only the following day.
Honenu attorney Naftali Wertzberger quickly filed an urgent appeal with the Jerusalem Magistrate Court on the remand in a demand to immediately bring the detainees to court, because the police wanted to leave them in remand overnight for no reason. It should be noted that the police announced that they would request a conditional release.
However Judge Ehrenberg, who ruled on the request, rejected the appeal and did not even see fit to request a response from the police. The judge ruled that there is an officer’s decision to detain the two and that he does not know if the interrogation has actually been completed.
Honenu, which is representing the detainees, did not give up and filed an appeal on the decision with the Jerusalem District Court. Jerusalem District Court Judge Moshe Yo’ed HaCohen scheduled a deliberation on the appeal for 18:30, to which representatives of the Binyamin Police did not even bother to appear. Binyamin Police interrogation officer Shai DeCosta sent a letter to the court in which he requested that the deliberation be postponed until the following morning, because it is an “annoying appeal”.
Court: “The police are making their own laws”
Judge HaCohen leveled strong criticism at the police for their conduct, and also at Judge Ehrenberg, who did not bother to request a response from the police. Judge HaCohen wrote in his decision that if Judge Ehrenberg had received a response from the police, it is reasonable to assume that he would have scheduled the deliberation for the afternoon, being as the interrogation had been completed in the morning and the police announced that they would request a conditional release for the detainees.
The Judge HaCohen ruled that the position of the police “is baseless and contrary to the basic principles of human dignity and freedom. It in fact reflects administrative ease and not a fundamental principle.” The judge also ruled that by the failure of representatives from the police and the detainees to appear at the deliberation, the police is making its own laws. “The respondent [the police] has a public obligation and the manner in which no representative of the police or the detainees appeared in court in order to justify the request and instead sent a document that could be interpreted as either a request for postponement or a written statement of position is unacceptable to me. In this matter the respondent made its own laws when it should have been an example of how the law and rulings of the court are followed,” wrote the judge in his decision.
The judge ruled that a copy of the decision would be transferred to the commanding officer of the Yehuda and Shomron District Police.
At the end of the deliberation Judge HaCohen decided that the police must release the detainees at the police station or alternatively bring them to the magistrate court that night for a deliberation. The police filed a request with the magistrate court to hold a deliberation on the detainees. Judge Ehrenberg scheduled a deliberation for 2:00 AM.
Honenu reported that, “This is not the first time the police has attempted to “punish” detainees by leaving them in remand without a genuine reason. The urgent appeals that Honenu has filed have resulted more than once in the release of detainees who could have otherwise spent an additional night in remand for no reason.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010