Sunday, August 26, 2018, 14:41 The General Security Service (GSS) paid 6,500 NIS in compensation to a youth who was summoned to an interrogation at the police station by an official police summons form, but upon his arrival discovered that the matter at hand was an inquiry with a GSS agent intended to recruit him as a source of information. Such a recruitment constitutes a violation of the law and a fraudulent and illegal misrepresentation of a police interrogation, because in fact the purpose of the summons was a preliminary inquiry conducted by a representative of the GSS. Approximately one year ago the Supreme Court unequivocally prohibited the GSS from using this method to summon citizens for recruiting purposes.
The incident for which the youth was compensated occurred one year ago, during the summer of 2017, when a policeman talked with the youth by phone and requested that he come to the Northern District Police Station. The youth requested a written summons and one week later he received an official police summons form which specified that the purpose of the summons was an interrogation. When he arrived at the station he was taken to one of the rooms for a preliminary inquiry by the GSS, and not interrogated by the police at all.
During the discussion the GSS representative attempted to recruit the youth and to convince him to regularly hold conversations between them. The youth did not cooperate. At no time during the preliminary inquiry was the youth informed that he was not obligated to cooperate with the inquiry, that he could leave, that nothing he said would be used against him and that if he left the inquiry no sanctions whatsoever would be taken against him, according to the guidelines set by the Supreme Court for the GSS with regards to citizens being questioned.
On behalf of the youth, Honenu filed a complaint against the GSS with the department of the Justice Ministry which examines interrogees’ complaints and with the Public Complaints Officer in the Northern Police District where the incident took place. The youth did not receive any reply from either of them and subsequently, with an additional complainant who had a similar experience, filed a civil suit with the Tzfat Magistrate Court.
The statement of claim mentions that the police summoned the complainants to an interrogation with an official police summons form, when in fact an inquiry by the GSS in any police interrogation facility “deviates from the obligation of the GSS to the State [of Israel], and the directives of the Supreme Court to the GSS,” and also, “The police and the GSS violated explicit directives from the Supreme Court, violated basic freedoms of the complainants without authority to do so, and damaged the character of the State [of Israel] as a democratic state.” The youth sued the GSS for 15,000 NIS in compensation for illegal violation of his freedom and civil security.
Following negotiations with the attorney representing the GSS, a representative of the Northern District Attorney, Hadas Alkobi Malachi, the two sides agreed that the suit would be dropped, the youth would not be required to pay court fees and in return the GSS would pay the youth 6,500 NIS in compensation. The GSS did not file a statement of defense against the suit filed by the youth.
Honenu is currently handling several similar cases and emphasizes that the GSS is not authorized to require people to come to inquiries or discussions, and if they do so, it constitutes a violation of the law and they are obligated to compensate the affected individuals.
Honenu Attorney Menashe Yado, who represented the youth: “We are forced to fight tooth and nail against the wearing away of the rights of right-wing activists by the security authorities, which is supported by the public and the Supreme Court.
After the internal review authorities ignored our requests, we filed a legitimate civil suit. The Attorney General’s office did not even file a statement of defense on behalf of the GSS. Instead, both sides agreed to drop the case since the GSS, also according to the understanding of the Attorney General’s office, undoubtedly operated illegally.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010