Sunday, March 24, 16:34 A rock thrown by a youth trying to impress his friends resulted in a case heard before the Supreme Court of Israel after the police insisted that the youth remain in remand until the end of proceedings. Justice Amit ruled that the youth did not attempt to damage a passing car and did not find cause to interfere with the Jerusalem District Court’s decision. Attorney Itamar Ben-Gvir, who is representing the youth on behalf of Honenu, states that the case has a strong scent of racism.
Last Wednesday (March 20) a 17 year old youth from the community of Ma’aleh Amos in the Etzion Bloc was detained and taken to the Etzion Bloc Police Station where he was interrogated on suspicion of throwing a rock at the road passing the community of Ma’aleh Amos. According to the youth, who cooperated during interrogation, two days previously he was in the area with friends and threw a rock towards the road in order to impress them. The youth stated that he could not have hit a vehicle from the distance at which he stood and indeed none was hit. After he threw the rock an IDF soldier approached him and reprimanded him for his act. The youth and the soldier argued and after a short while their conversation ended. According to the youth the soldier asked him for his name at the end of the conversation and he answered.
Two days later the youth was detained on suspicion of endangering lives on a highway. Already the following day the police filed a severe indictment with the Jerusalem District Court, indicating the seriousness of the act in their opinion, and demanded that the 17 year old youth be kept in remand until the end of proceedings. Attorney Itamar Ben-Gvir, who is representing the youth on behalf of Honenu, pleaded that the youth has no criminal record whatsoever and did not in actual fact endanger anyone. Additionally the youth expressed regret for his action and cooperated with his interrogators. Jerusalem District Court Judge Rafael Ya’akobi rejected the police demand and voiced strong criticism on, in his opinion, the strange request for remand until the end of proceedings in a case such as this. The judge ruled that the youth would be released to partial house arrest in addition to posting bail. In response to the police request to delay carrying out the release for 48 hours the judge stated that the request itself is an abuse of process and rejected the request.
The Attorney General’s office appealed the case with the Supreme Court of Israel and a deliberation was scheduled for Sunday, March 24 before Justice Ya’akov Amit. During the deliberation the prosecution reiterated its opinion that this is a serious incident which necessitates remand until the end of proceedings or at least until the youth probation service suggests an alternative to remand. Justice Amit was not impressed by the claims of the Attorney General’s office and accepted the opinion of Ben-Gvir that this is a case of a youth with no criminal record who cooperated under interrogation and expressed regret for his act. Justice Amit added that the youth had not directly aimed the rock from close range, which lessens the severity of the act. In the end Justice Amit acquiesced to the request by the prosecution to tighten the conditions of the youth’s house arrest. The youth will remain at home other than to attend prayers in synagogue.
Ben-Gvir, who represented the youth on behalf of Honenu, severely criticized the conduct of the police. “The conduct of the Attorney General’s office in this case has a strong scent of racism and discrimination against Jews. Only two weeks ago Arabs threw rocks at my wife and the police from the Hevron Police Station who apprehended the suspects told my wife that they were, all in all, youths and gave them a warning. In this case the Attorney General’s office requested to keep the youth in remand for several months. It is difficult for me to understand this policy unless someone is trying to satisfy the incoming Justice Minister. The Supreme Court did well to reject the appeal, although I reason that it would have been appropriate to reprimand the Attorney General’s office. In a case such as this it is inappropriate to request remand until end of proceedings. Not a week goes by in which, due to their status as a minor, the Attorney General’s office doesn’t release youths who have committed misdemeanors several times worse. It is unfortunate that in this case the Attorney General’s office took such an extreme stance and it is good that their demands were not accepted.”
-
Wednesday, August 7, 2024, 13:28 Yesterday (Tuesday), security forces and Civil Administration personnel destroyed four structures at Tzur Yisrael, a hilltop community in the Binyamin region. Three Yehuda and Shomron residents who protested the destruction and remained at the site a short time after the structures were destroyed were detained by the police who claimed that they had violated a closed military zone order.
-
Tuesday, August 6, 2024, 15:12 In February 2023, border police officers and Civil Administration personnel destroyed a vineyard under Jewish ownership near Shilo following a claim that it was situated on “private Palestinian land”. Dozens of protesters arrived in an attempt to prevent the destruction, among them Knesset Member Limor Son Har-Melech (Otzma Yehudit), who obstructed a tractor and was then assaulted by four border police officers.
-
Sunday, August 4, 2024, 21:33 On Sunday, a hearing for the soldiers detained at the Sde Teiman Military Base on suspicion of assaulting a Nukhba terrorist was held at the Beit Lid Military Court. Honenu Attorneys Adi Keidar and Nati Rom demanded the immediate release of the soldiers whom they are representing
-
Archives
- December 2024
- November 2024
- October 2024
- September 2024
- August 2024
- July 2024
- June 2024
- May 2024
- April 2024
- March 2024
- February 2024
- January 2024
- December 2023
- November 2023
- September 2023
- August 2023
- July 2023
- June 2023
- May 2023
- April 2023
- March 2023
- February 2023
- January 2023
- December 2022
- November 2022
- October 2022
- September 2022
- August 2022
- July 2022
- June 2022
- May 2022
- April 2022
- March 2022
- February 2022
- January 2022
- December 2021
- November 2021
- October 2021
- September 2021
- August 2021
- July 2021
- June 2021
- May 2021
- April 2021
- March 2021
- February 2021
- January 2021
- December 2020
- November 2020
- October 2020
- September 2020
- August 2020
- July 2020
- June 2020
- May 2020
- April 2020
- March 2020
- February 2020
- January 2020
- December 2019
- November 2019
- October 2019
- September 2019
- August 2019
- July 2019
- June 2019
- May 2019
- April 2019
- March 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- September 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- June 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010